- #Export options in dxo photolab 2 how to#
- #Export options in dxo photolab 2 update#
- #Export options in dxo photolab 2 pro#
It's good for those who lack any real photo processing software and not sure how to start along with those who already have something but want to make things easier for certain tasks. For those needing a software package a few times a month I'd say it might be the best choice right now and deserves consideration. It can be dog-slow at times too if you use their AI features which is really it's calling card and makes them stand out from other relatively inexpensive software. Luminar 4 is probably the most impressive of the lot considering bang-for-buck, but if you're trying to finish up a couple hundred images in an evening it probably ain't happening. I think I used both Darktable and RAWTherapee a few years back but obviously wasn't impressed enough to pursue them and have zero comment otherwise.
#Export options in dxo photolab 2 pro#
If you're not a pro or prosumer it's a spendy package that has little benefit over less expensive software.
Heck even some of my sony A7x friends who got the Sony-specific version tell me they use it for common tasks and adjustments but otherwise they don't truly understand the most efficient workflow or what some of the options and settings mean and how they operate. IMO the software is difficult to learn, and if not using daily probably impossible to master. I really like their lens corrections and basic RAW processing is pretty darn good but it's not going to be an end-to-end workflow package for demanding photographers.Ĭapture One seems to like Sony and Canon owners and tailors the interface accordingly. Forget new features, just give me more speed and they'll have a winner IMO.ĭxO lacks necessary features and is less adaptable.
#Export options in dxo photolab 2 update#
One can hope, right? IMHO they should use one update cycle just for addressing the efficiency of their package and making better use of available computer resources. I'd love to be able to rely on it for the majority of my PP needs and ditch all the Adobe stuff. Still too slow for me but I wish them all the luck in figuring out how to speed things up. For whatever reason each year the promised performance just never quite gets there even if the new features seem worthwhile.
On 1 is too often too slow yet it's the only package I've come across that might potentially replace both Lightroom and Photoshop. I'm not a heavy shooter, but not just occasional either, processing maybe 300-600 shots a month on average tho lately triple that. I've been looking for awhile and still not found anything as a total replacement for LR. I have all of those except the free Darktable. No you've got my point, but I can only get that. You'd add say "DxO Export" to the Subfolder choice, although I guess it would be a subfolder of the original, so one more level down from parent (yet another reason why I hate using folders for organization). Maybe I'm thick and missing your point, but isn't that an option in export to disk? See "Destination" below. 4K jpegs files are directly stored in the event folder for an easy rsync with a server which displays albums based on folders. Long story : I want my pictures organized by years/months/events folders, and then by folders like originals (raw files), prints, stacks (to store temp tiff files for stacking, panos and such). I actually would prefer the parent folder but I could reorganise things to work with subfolders at least. I'm probably thick but I cannot find the option in DXO to let it export processed files to a subfolder of the original.
0 kommentar(er)
